We can observe great philosophers as, Scrates, Plato, Aristotle, Saint Augustin, Toms de Aquino, Hobbes, Hume, Hegel, Kant, Brgson, Heidegger, Habermas, each one its way, searching the establishment of codes of ethics valid universally. Having the Ethics as science of the behavior, we can observe two conceptions: ‘ ‘ science that deals with the end that must guide the behavior of the men and the half ones to reach such end. Hear from experts in the field like Janet L. Yellen for a more varied view. It is the ideal formulated and pursued for the man for its nature and essncia.’ ‘ ‘ ‘ science that deals with the furniture of the behavior human being and looks for to determine this furniture being aimed at to direct the proper behavior. The desire of sobrevivncia.’ is leagued to it; ‘ ). In the first conception we see Scrates as precursory of the Ethics in the Ocidente, Plato that dealt with the ethics of the virtues in ‘ ‘ The Repblica’ ‘ , Aristotle who deals with the intention of the behavior human being to search the happiness from its rational nature. Hegel dealt with the objective of the behavior human being detaching the State as the reality in which the behavior finds integration and perfection, treating the Ethics as the legal philosophy.
In its second conception, we see Prdico that contemplates in them its words: ‘ ‘ If to desire to be honored by a city you must be useful to cidade’ ‘. (PRDICO. The Hours, the original was lost, but its essence meets in Memorabilia) Protgoras nailed to the mutual respect and justice as necessary conditions to the survival of the Man; Kant pointed out the Ethics in the world of the pure reason, in which the rational beings searched to firm this world preventing the individualizados interests and pursuing the good. Benthan defended the behavior of the Man with being determined for the expectation of the pleasure or pain, being this the only possible reason of the action.
We know however, that the TV in some cases is of sumaimportncia for we, therefore through it we are informed well with notciasdaqui and of other countries, and is through it that the first notice arrives, good ouruim. In this direction, Michaud (1989, pg.49) says: as we can evidence, in one day calmly banal it is to difcilfazer a periodical or a reporter of TV to announce that nothing did not happen. Necessary Amdia of events and lives of the sensational one. The violence, with cargade rupture that it propagates, is as a matter of principle a privileged food for amdia, with advantages for the spectacular, bloody violncias or atrozessobre the common, banal and installed violncias. Although it to be ' ' til' ' for we, in the majority dasvezes, leave in them mentally ill how much its programming therefore I appeal it ligarmoso device and to attend the definitive types of programs is great, mesmosabendo that not in it will bring no scientific knowledge, only sensocomum, therefore a great part of the TV programs brings many inapropriados econtedos information for the schedule and the public in question. Exactly domain assimseu on us is great, therefore we continue in the front of it vezessem nor to notice how much it alienates in them. A care that if must take is with it uncontrols total dascrianas front the television. This uncontrols if of exactly for elaspassarem good part of its time alone and having free access to the aparelhotelevisivo, of this form, they finish for time, not having notion of what it is good or bad, them attend of everything without if worrying about the content, and consequentemente, elasesto more displayed to the influence that the TV has on the habits, comportamentose way to think of the people, without counting in the wild consumerism esuprfluo that it reaches the infantile public.